Interesting thoughts displayed in this VIDEO from Nick Burnett who explores different challenges of learning in the future.
Is Bioethics under the same paradigm?
The present BLOG, designed and created by Irene N. Melamed, MD, MSc is an ongoing project developed during the Children´s Mercy Certificate Bioethics Program to an in depth analysis and exploration of different topics regarding "teaching bioethics". Many thanks to all the staff of the Program for their continuous support and specially to Dr John Lantos, MD, for his leadership and inspiring orientation.
Interesting thoughts displayed in this VIDEO from Nick Burnett who explores different challenges of learning in the future.
Is Bioethics under the same paradigm?
For many years and still continues Bioethics debates whether or not the issue of "professionalism" is within its competence.
Beyond this, it is important to bring it into the arena of debate and especially analyze its relevance for the training of health professionals in the early years of their careers (but not only).
Professionalism is an integral component and goal of medical schools and residency education. Over the past 13 years, the "Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME), and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) have spearheaded educational reform in professionalism"*.
Medical ethics and humanities curricula should incorporate assessable goals of medical education that promote the continuous development of professionalism in the physician’s lifelong learning, according with Doukas, David J., et al (2013)*
The authors recommend that such teaching should have five components:
*Doukas, David J., et al. "The challenge of promoting professionalism through medical ethics and humanities education." Academic Medicine 88.11 (2013): 1624-1629.
Image: Meetings of minds, Seattle
In contrast to experiences that are planned from the beginning and designed to be online, emergency remote teaching (ERT) Charles Hodges, et al (2020) is a temporary shift of instructional delivery to an alternate delivery mode due to crisis circumstances.
Based on this numerous research studies, theories, models, standards, and evaluation criteria focus on quality online learning, online teaching, and online course design. What it is known from research is that effective online learning results from careful instructional design and planning, using a systematic model for design and development,
As Charles Hodges et al (2020) considers the "need to "just get it online" is in direct contradiction to the time and effort normally dedicated to developing a quality course. Online courses created in this way should not be mistaken for long-term solutions but accepted as a temporary solution to an immediate problem".
Do you agree? What is your experience in this topic? Comments are welcome!!